首页> 外文OA文献 >The cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation services provided by general dental practice, general medical practice, pharmacy and NHS Stop Smoking Services in the North of England
【2h】

The cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation services provided by general dental practice, general medical practice, pharmacy and NHS Stop Smoking Services in the North of England

机译:英格兰北部一般牙科诊所,一般医疗机构,药房和NHs戒烟服务提供的戒烟服务的成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation services in general dental practice (dental), general medical practice (GMP), pharmacy and NHS Stop Smoking Services (NHS SSS) from the perspective of the provider and the perspective of the NHS. Methods: Retrospective monitoring data from NHS Bradford were accessed for any client attending a smoking cessation advisor within one of four commissioned smoking cessation services delivered by and within dental, GMP, pharmacy and NHS SSS (July 2011–December 2011). The treatment outcome of interest was ‘quits’ (effectiveness), and costs were assessed using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) which compared each service setting against usual care (NHS SSS). All data were analysed using SPSS 19. Results: For verified quits, only pharmacy services showed a lower mean cost per client and a higher proportion of CO verified quits than the other services. For both verified and self-reported quits dental services showed a slightly higher proportion of quits than NHS SSS; however, the mean cost per client was higher (£278.38 for an increase in quits of 1%). The GMP services were dominated by the NHS SSS, in as much as they were both less effective (a smaller proportion of quits and more expensive). This finding also holds true when we compared GMP services and pharmacy services. Conclusions: From the perspective of the service provider and the NHS, the service considered to be ‘cost-effective’ when compared with ‘usual care’ (NHS SSS) was pharmacy services. This research has identified variations in service costs and effectiveness of services through the analysis of a pragmatic data set. Given the exploratory nature of this research, further research should explore the impact of service/location selection on uptake and cessation rates.
机译:目标:从提供者和NHS的角度比较一般牙科实践(牙科),一般医学实践(GMP),药房和NHS戒烟服务(NHS SSS)的戒烟服务的成本效益。方法:在牙医,GMP,药房和NHS SSS以及在其内部提供的四个委托戒烟服务之一中,从参加NHS Bradford的任何客户那里获取戒烟顾问的回顾性监测数据(2011年7月至2011年12月)。感兴趣的治疗结果是“退出”(有效性),并使用递增的成本效益比(ICER)评估成本,该比率将每种服务设置与常规护理(NHS SSS)进行了比较。使用SPSS 19对所有数据进行了分析。结果:与其他服务相比,对于经过验证的退出,只有药房服务显示出每位客户的平均成本较低,而经过CO验证的退出所占的比例更高。对于经过核实和自行报告的退出,牙科服务的退出比例比NHS SSS略高;但是,每位客户的平均费用较高(退出增加1%的费用为278.38英镑)。 GMP服务主要由NHS SSS主导,因为它们的效果均较差(退出的比例较小且价格较高)。当我们比较GMP服务和药房服务时,这一发现也成立。结论:从服务提供商和NHS的角度来看,与“常规护理”(NHS SSS)相比被认为“具有成本效益”的服务是药房服务。这项研究通过分析务实的数据集,确定了服务成本和服务有效性的差异。考虑到这项研究的探索性,进一步的研究应探索服务/地点选择对摄取和戒烟率的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号